Politics and the Problems with Literal Translation

September 29th, 2013

There’s no field where words matter more than politics, yet an awkward literal translation still slips through from time to time.

Politics and the Problems with Literal Translation | One Hour Translation

A long time ago when I was younger and more frivolous, I had a bunch of T-Shirts made that had ‘Language Matters’ on them and gave them out to my colleagues.

It wasn’t meant as anything more than a funny gesture, a bonding moment for a group of beleaguered translation services professionals who were gathering scars in the language wars, but the sentiment, for me at least, still rings true: Language does matter. More importantly, precision in language matters.

Often, when I hear people talk about legal translation issues they focus on the big catchwords of today: Localisation or Translation Memory. In my opinion, that leaves out one of the most fundamental aspects of high quality translation work: Accuracy of intent. In other words, translators sometimes miss the forest for the trees when it comes to crafting translations that work as persuasive examples of communication as well as accurate representations of the writer’s intent.

Speeches in Arabic

A great example of what I’m talking about is a famous (or infamous) speech given by Paul Bremmer when he was acting as the Administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority of Iraq a few years ago. It was a Ramadan speech, and as such was designed to demonstrate understanding of the Islamic culture and concerns – to be a reassuring speech from a man representing a powerful military that had just marched in and effected regime change in the area. And the text of the speech did just that. It was not a brilliant speech, but a good enough speech that had it been translated with skill and verve and a real feel for the local audience, it would have done its job.

However, it wasn’t translated well. It was translated literally, and in that sense it was an expert job: The words on the page meant pretty much what Bremmer meant to say. All well and good, but the style was extremely stilted and extremely awkward, and while a local Arabic speaker might, after some mental gymnastics, be able to work out what was meant, it wasn’t immediately obvious.

Accuracy Not Literalness

The key to any high quality translation isn’t slavish accuracy to the precise words and phrases being used, but a slavish dedication to conveying meaning. It is often impossible to bring constructions and idioms from one language into another. Instead of trying, with convoluted grammar and obscure vocabulary that is technically correct while being functionally incorrect, the better approach is to recast the words into something that a local speaker of the target language will easily understand.

The main advantage of accuracy of meaning over literal translation? Much less chance of being misunderstood – and much less chance of being mocked. Bremmer is still the butt of jokes in the Arabic world for his mangled speech. If you work in politics, you can’t afford to just give away your dignity with a tortured, awkward, literal translation.

Image courtesy flickr.com/photos/torisan3500

You might also like:

A pivotal localization industry event, LocFromHome keeps localization professionals current on key industry issues. This year’s talks explored four pre-selected topics: Business, Productivity, Engineering, and Outlook. Within these topic areas, participants were able to explore global trends, discuss business strategies, and learn about useful productivity tools. All from the comfort of their homes. We’re especially proud that Nir Sabato, our Head of Strategy, was selected to present on How to Find Your LSP Identity. In case you missed the event, you can read the summary of Nir’s presentation in this post.